Con gun control

As with many other hot-button topics — abortion, LGBT and marijuana, for example — partisans appear to shout past each other rather than actually communicate. These traumatic assaults to the body are caused by homicide, suicide and accident.

Gun Control Pros and Cons: The Never-Ending Debate

Former firearm owners will save money on range ammo and gun cleaning supplies. When tension mounts, it will eventually erupt in the most unpleasant of ways.

Decreases in violent crime, on the other hand, track with a larger pool of gun owners. Takes Power From The People It is a constitutional right to be able to have weapons to defend yourself, including guns.

Fewer Gun Owners Mean More Crime Ineconomist Mark Gius discovered that laws restricting conceal carry coincided with higher gun-related murder rates. The following is a summary of the reasoning of the two positions. Some critics even term gun control as a form of people-control wherein you surrender everything you possess when you are a victim of a criminal act.

The cons are easy as Con gun control currently billions of public money is being hijacked by gun control laws and interventions that serve absolutely no useful to citizens purpose. Gunshot accidents frequently involve children laying hold of firearms when their parents are absent.

Should civilian possession of handguns and other non-hunting guns be banned or severely restricted?

Governments do not institute gun control because the want to reduce crime, Government knows that is impossible. The Self Defense Argument One often hears anti-gun-control activists argue that if guns were banned or severely regulated, only the criminals would have access to them and law-abiding citizens would be helpless.

Pros and Cons of Gun Control

Do people need to arm themselves to the teeth and hope to make last stands fighting against Big Brother? It is also observed that if law-abiding citizens have guns, they are better equipped to handle situations where they might find themselves face-to-face with criminals, thus bringing the crime rate down.

We need more restrictions on guns! Criminals will still find a way to gain illegal possession of guns or firearms as they do not respect the law.

Public safety, personal security and Con gun control freedom is the price that will be paid. Sport shooting, or hunting, or a gun culture that glamorizes and legitimizes unnecessary gun ownership can desensitize ordinary people to the fatal effects of guns and firearms in general.

Nobody but free people do not need to beg government to own guns. The answer is an emphatic no. In fact, if both parties have guns, it will most definitely result in a firefight and unnecessary bloodshed. What is needed, however, is a greater focus on education about firearms.

It can render victims helpless and make criminals out of ordinary individuals. Regulating guns will at least prevent their access from homes and businesses. Or a machine gun that can fire hundreds of rounds per minute? Many of the mass shootings between and likewise involved illegally procured firearms.

Having to jump through a bunch of hoops will likely deter anyone looking to obtain a weapon to commit a crime. The mail-order sales and the interstate sales of firearms have also been addressed and prohibited.

However, having gun control laws is intended to restrict the number of guns floating around in the system, ready to be used on innocents. We should teach people from an early age the damage that they can do, how to properly and safely use them, and the steps to take to make sure that they are safely used and stored.

The regulation of firearms ignites such opposing passions because it pits long-cherished constitutional protections against public safety. Has this resulted in the lowering of gun crime? The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution was targeted towards militia, e. This is the eye-for-an-eye logic. Unless convicted of criminal behavior in a court of law, a U.

Too many criminals purchase guns legally and use them to commit crimes. The debate of gun control has made no headway at the Federal level despite nation-wide attention and coverage of recent incidences of mass killings like those at Tucson, Virginia Tech, and Columbine.Gun control is inflicting stricter and more harsh regulations on owning and carrying fire arms, which many people believe is the answer.

However, arguers believe that the right to have guns is part of every American’s constitutional rights. Con 9 Gun control laws and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides. Lithuania has one of the world's lowest gun ownership rates ( guns per people) but its suicide rate (by any method) was perpeople inthe highest suicide rate among 71 countries with available information.

Japan has a low gun ownership rate. Gun control means fewer deaths and fewer gun thefts but it also violates the 2nd amendment and may be ineffective. Read on to learn more about gun control pros and cons.

What are the pros and cons about gun control in the US? Pros * It’s good for people who know nothing about guns to feel like they’ve Done Something * It’s good for people for whom studying the underlying causes of societal violence is too difficul.

Pro-Con Debate regarding increasing gun control regulations. Sep 03,  · News about Guns and Gun Control, including commentary and archival articles published in The New York Times.

Con gun control
Rated 0/5 based on 51 review