An argument against the legalization of drugs in the us

Stringent laws, spectacular police drives, vigorous prosecution, and imprisonment of addicts and peddlers have proved not only useless and enormously expensive as means of correcting this evil, but they are also unjustifiably and unbelievably cruel in their application to the unfortunate drug victims.

Only major retailers that can handle massive shipments, have their own small fleet of aircraft, troops to defend the caravans and other sophisticated methods of eluding the police such as lawyerscan survive by this regulation of the free market by the government He develops a convincing argument that imprisonment is never morally justified for drug use.

In addition, it would solve many of the issues associated with drugs, including poverty, crimeand violence. See, if you look at the drug war from a purely economic point of view, the role of the government is to protect the drug cartel.

There should be intelligent treatment of the incurables in outpatient clinics, hospitalization of those not too far gone to respond to therapeutic measures, and application of the prophylactic principles which medicine applies to all scourges of mankind.

These drinks the company then sold to its British workers at cost, in the local currency at the official exchange rate, which was approximately one-sixth the black-market rate. The only accounts according to which drug use is immoral are religiously based and generally not shared in the citizenry.

It would remove the social stigma attached to illicit drug use, and would send a message of tolerance for drug use, especially to youth.

Arguments for and against drug prohibition

To the contrary, if the use of narcotics and stimulants were to become virtually universal, as is by no means impossible, the number of situations in which compulsory checks upon people would have to be carried out, for reasons of public safety, would increase enormously.

Husak, conceding a connection between drug use and crime, turns the argument upside-down, showing how punishment increases rather than decreases crime. It stands to reason, therefore, that all these problems would be resolved at a stroke if everyone were permitted to smoke, swallow, or inject anything he chose.

Therefore, when a patient anecdotally reports a drug to have medicinal value, this must be followed by objective scientific studies. For another, he quotes a statistic showing that approximately four times as many persons die annually from using prescribed medicines than die from using illegal drugs.

Commentary Magazine

With illicit drug use peaking in the s in the United States, the "Just Say No" campaign, initiated under the patronage of Nancy Reagan, coincided with recent past month illicit drug use decreases from In the USA, figures estimate that It says that EU rules set out strict criteria for the acceptance of a drug for medical use: It is of course true, but only trivially so, that the present illegality of drugs is the cause of the criminality surrounding their distribution.

Husak concludes, "If I am correct, prohibitionists are more clearly guilty of immorality than their opponents. More than four decades of the War on Drugs has systematically criminalized certain populations while doing very little to reduce violent crime. After considering four standard justifications for punishing drug users Husak concludes that "the arguments for criminalization are not sufficiently persuasive to justify the infliction of punishment.

Walton, Judge Reggie B.

At the same time, other pleasure-producing drugs, such as tobacco, alcohol, and caffeine, though legally regulated for the purposes of consumer safety and under-age consumption, can be purchased over the counter.

The first step in any plan to alleviate this dreadful affliction should be the establishment of Federal control and dispensation — at cost — of habit-forming drugs.

The study suggested that a causal role of cannabis use in later hard drug usage is minimal, if it exists at all, and that cannabis use and hard drug use share the same influencing factors such as genetics and environment.

In Australia, which has had the highest opioid mortality per capita in the OECD, [1] studies found that "overdose fatality is not a simple function of heroin dose or purity.

Even many of the harmful physical effects of illicit drugs stem from their illegal status: Are you in favour of continued prohibition for illegal drugs? These now include vast networks of organised crime, endemic violence related to the drug market, corruption of law enforcement and governments.

Mainly I think that what public debate there is on the subject is flawed, because talking about all drugs in the same breath is misleading as they are very different in their effects. Drug use is dangerous to persons besides the user, in the rise of health care costs, violence associated with the use of drugs, neglect of children by drug-addicted parents, and other third party effects.

To advocate the legalization of drugs calls for a legal system in which the production and sale of drugs are not criminal offenses. Criminalizing the everyday user does not make society a good place.

And if it is true that the consumption of these drugs in itself predisposes to criminal behavior as data from our clinic suggestit is also possible that the effect on the rate of criminality of this rise in consumption would swamp the decrease that resulted from decriminalization.

It is something I know from personal acquaintance by working in the emergency room and in the wards of our hospital. The same may be true of illicit drugs such as opiates, cocaine and amphetamine in developed societies.

The intermediate position on drug legalization, such as that espoused by Ethan Nadelmann, director of the Lindesmith Center, a drug policy research institute sponsored by financier George Soros, is emphatically not the answer to drug-related crime.

They also argue that the reduction in the price will lead to little, if any, growth in drug addiction, due to the inelasticity of demand. The Case for Legalizing Drugs There is a common misconception that drugs are generally bad for you. Marijuana Tea — A great way to consume your greens in a lovely drink.

It does so by permitting and indeed, causing the drug trade to remain a lucrative source of economic opportunity for street dealers, drug kingpins and all those willing to engage in the often violent, illicit, black market trade.

It could be MDMA. I have personal experience of this effect. Most damning of all is the fact that prohibition seems to create crime as much if not more than it prevents crime.

Availability is a leading factor associated with increased drug use.Argument Against Drug Legalization. The main argument against legalization is that drugs are dangerous. But that's not the whole story.

The Case for Legalizing Drugs

If you extend that logic of what happened after the Prohibition era to cannabis, ecstasy, and similar drugs, you won't end up with the violence and fear traditionally associated with drug deals and so on.

Even better, drugs. "Arguments Against the Legalization of Drugs," Campuses Without Drugs International, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA Brown, Dr. Lee, Dir.

The Arguments For and Against Drug Prohibition

of Office of National Drug Control Policy, "Eight Myths About Drugs," Presented at the Conference on Crime, Drugs, Health and Prohibition, Harvard Law School May 21, - Drug Legalization Drug legalization has become a great issue among Americans for many years, and there have also been those that try to stop that legalization.

The article, “Legalizing Drugs is Not the Solution” by Gerald W. Lynch, has a good argument based on facts and incidents that have occurred from drug use.

The economic argument for drug legalization says: legalize drugs, and generate tax income. This argument is gaining favour, as national administrations seek new sources of revenue during the current economic crisis.

This legalize and tax argument is un-ethical and uneconomical. History shows us that making drugs illegal creates criminal enterprises, and prohibition exacerbates the very real dangers of impurity, violence, and poverty. Education and harm reduction strategies are much more effective ways to reduce the dangers of drugs.

Inthe President appointed me chairman of the National Advisory Council for Drug Abuse Prevention. Created by Congress, the Council was charged with providing.

An argument against the legalization of drugs in the us
Rated 3/5 based on 1 review